At the time of application, is the project I submit supposed to be in-progress (or even near completion), or speculative/proposed? The PR materials sound like I’m presenting on work already done/near done, but the criteria language for judging sounds speculative.
The project should be in progress but not completed. This will allow for you to share the potential impact of the work on the scientific world and your personal career journey as well as how disruptive you anticipate it will be. Assuming many students will be working over the summer, these types of research projects would be great to highlight.
Can I only submit if I need funding? I.e., are awards based on budgetary needs, or can I win just for being fabulously disruptive? Is the award discretionary, budget-driven, or some combination?
The research will be selected based off the ones that are most disruptive to the industry. Budgetary needs will not be addressed or questioned in the application.
Can a team submit? How?
We are most focused on individual submissions. However, we are open to a small group (2-3) of students applying if they are in the same lab. If a team applies, they will be able to present together during the lightning round or poster presentation and if selected as a winner, will split the prize money.
Can this be work that’s already supported financially?
Yes.
Can this be something I’m doing under faculty/staff mentorship, or must it be completely ‘independent’? If the former, is there a clear line between me being ‘the researcher’ vs. a staffer in someone’s lab?
This can be research completed under a faculty/staff mentorship or completed independently. For students working with a PI, you will be required to submit a letter showcasing your PI is okay with your participation.